добавилось новое слушанье
09/22/2010 at 10:00 am in department 5 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
STATUS HEARING (RE STATUS REPORT ON MANAGEMENT OFENTERPRISE)

Вот прикол, помнится, на форуме вопрос был (по-моему твой, Яна): а почему Раймона в свой иск не включила зарплату? Теперь включила, аккурат 7 апреля)) Занятно все же))
И повариха наша - туда же..

P.S. У меня вопрос появился по ходу.
Как может компания Майкла (The Michael Jackson Company) подать на него в суд? Разве юридически это правомочно?

Отредактировано KP_Cathy (13-04-2010 15:21:48)

перенесу сюда свое старое сообщение из другой ветки......

----

Список немного устаревший, но тем не менее достаточно интересный (http://lesliemjhu.blogspot.com/)
Overview of the legal cases related to the Estate of Michael Joseph Jackson:

Creditors:
- Ayscough and Marar - former legal representatives ($200.000)
- Susan Yu - former legal representatives ($340.000)
- Sidney Lanier - former legal representatives ($3 million)
- Atkins Thomson Solicitors - former business representatives ($200.000)
- Cannon and Company CPAS LLP - former accounting firm ($56.000)
- Don Stabler - former business advisor ($180.000)
- Leonard Rowe - former business advisor ($300.000)
- Dr. Tohme Tohme - former business advisor ($2.3 million)
- George Folsey Jr. - former business partner ($1 million)
- John Landis - former business partner ($1.3 million)
- A4V Digital, Inc. - former business partners ($736.000)
- William Bone - former business partner ($ undetermined)
- Segye Times - former family business partners ($7.9 millions)
- LaVelle Smith Jr. - former coreographer ($150.000)
- Arnold Klein - former dermatologist ($50.000)
- Ola Ray - former actress ($ undetermined)
- Lynda Parrish - former personal hairstylist ($212.000)
- Helen Harris-Scott - unknown ($50 million)
- Jackson Prince Michael Malachi Jet - unknown
- Richard Lapointe - memorablia collector ($5 million)
TOTAL: $73 million

Raymone Bain vs. Michael Jackson
Bain's lawyers urges the Judge to go forward with the case since John Branca and John McClain were appointed as the permanent executors of the estate. However lawyers representing the estate in the case (Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP) are unsure if they will remain as counsel as per the decesion of the executors.

Jonathan Lee Richies vs. Michael Jackson
Erle Bonner vs. Michael Jackson
No known updates at all in these crazy cases.

Sylvester Johnson vs. Michael Jackson
The case has been closed on October 15, 2009 after the parties agreed on the terms.

AllGood Entertainment vs. Michael Jackson
AllGood Entertainment vs. Michael Jackson Estate
The company still wants to get money from the estate, however a dismissal on AEG Live's part is on the verge.

Michael Jackson Estate vs. Heal The World Foundation (fake)
Melissa Johnson's lawyers carefully addressed every paragraph of the original complaint. They admitted some of the accusations, but denied the most. Johnson claims that she has been told to keep MJ's intellectual property by his former management/employees. Next hearing: February 1, 2010.

Тем, кто смотрит раздел Probate Notes по делу Майкла BP 117321 пригодится такой список аббревиатур, с сайта суда:
http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/courtrul … endixA.pdf

Запись от апреля в разделе поданных документов - Documents Filed  (Filing dates listed in descending order):
04/22/2010 Creditor's Claim ($1,109,000,503,600.00 )
Filed by Claimant

Что это за сумма претензии такая и кто подал? Может я что-то пропустила...

не знаю куда добавить эту информацию, добавлю сюда, т.к. касается эстейта

Джо Джексон подал аппеляцию против отклонения судьей его прошения против назначения Бранки и Макклейна душеприказчиками
ссылка на состояние этого дела а аппеляционном суде
http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/ … no=B220404

Trial Court Case:  BP117321

Court of Appeal Case:  B220404   
Division:  7 
Case Caption:  Jackson v. Branca et al. 
Case Type:  CV 
Filing Date:  11/13/2009 

Date                          Description                                        Notes
11/20/2009  Notice of appeal lodged/received.    n/a 11/13/09 Joseph Jackson

11/20/2009  Request sent for service list of active parties/attys.    parties active to appeal only.

12/01/2009  Civil case information statement filed.    Attorney: Maureen Jaroscak Party: Joseph Jackson

12/01/2009  Service list update received from:    filed within case info statement

12/18/2009  Notice per rule 8.124 - with reporter's transcript.    Ntc of desig filed 11/17/09 SCLA.

12/28/2009  Telephone conversation with:    aplnt counsel Brian Oxman re: will file motion for calendar preference asap.

12/30/2009  Motion filed.    for calendar preference & expedited briefing schedule Attorney: Brian Oxman Party: Joseph Jackson

12/30/2009  Default appellant; no certificate of interested persons filed.    *default cured 1/15/10*

01/14/2010  Note:    Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.29, service on Attorney General required. Indication of service must be appear on cover of documents filed.

01/15/2010  Certificate of interested entities or persons filed by:    Brian Oxman for appellant Joseph Jackson.

01/19/2010  Order filed.    Appellant's motion for calendar preference and expedited briefing schedule filed December 30, 2009 is granted. All requests for extension of time to file briefs, if any, should be supported by a showing of exceptional good cause.

03/18/2010  Record on appeal filed.    R-1 (54 pgs)

03/24/2010  Record imaged.    To Ikon

04/07/2010  Record imaged.    From Ikon

04/28/2010  Requested - extension of time   

04/28/2010  Granted - extension of time.    No further extensions of time will be granted absent a detailed showing of exceptional need.

28/04 они попросили продления срока (видимо, для подачи документов), которое им и предоставили
и подача документов (appendix and opening brief - определение есть здесь
http://www.courts.alaska.gov/shc/appeal … rief.htm#1 , кому интересно) запланирована на 14.05.10

Appellant's appendix and opening brief filed.  05/14/2010  No further extensions of time will be granted absent a detailed showing of exceptional need

Отредактировано EllaS (11-05-2010 11:54:24)

А где первоисточник? Это енаверное какая-то опечатка, я даже сумму не прочту -Миллиард ?

Белла(Наталья) вообще вся информация отсюда,

но вот о первоисточнике (вы имеете скан документов, да?) я даже сомневаюсь, что их там могут выложить..все-таки, закрытая информация на мой взгляд, много нюансов.

со мной та же ситуация была)))), согласно википедии, число с 12 нулями - это тысяча миллиардов или миллион миллионов.
Но я думаю, что это сомнительно...может, миллиард и 600 миллионов? (забыли знак поставить?)

Ines
предположу,...... у нас доварищи в Америке по ходу дела вообще не сильно следят за правильностью написания той или иной информации......
может все-таки оЧепятка????
в противном случае, непонятно, где наш мальчик успел так провиниться........

http://www.contactmusic.com/news.nsf/st … im_1142952
появилась информация о еще одном иске эстейту, поданному спустя 4 месяца после окончания срока подачи исков.
Бывший менеджер Richard Arons, проработавший с Майклом 40 лет, обвиняет управляющих в том, что они не сообщили ему о необходимости подачи иска эстейту для того, чтобы продолжить получать причитающиеся роялти, согласно док-там поданным 14.05.10

на сайте суда его имя есть в списке сторон
ARONS RICHARD - Petitioner

а вот на счет иска ничего определенного - от 14.05 только это
05/14/2010 Probate-Other

Отредактировано EllaS (18-05-2010 16:28:36)

И ничего они не подали (может нечем крыть?)
а 17.06 аппеляционный суд их уведомил о непредоставлении документов, на которое они опять же пока не ответили.
следующая назначенная дата для подачи - 02/07/10.

Отредактировано EllaS (22-06-2010 19:59:32)

update:

Бранка и Макклейн подали ответные документы (Respondent's brief) 01.07.10 вот на эти док-ты было б интересно посмотреть
следующий ход за Джо, подача ответа назначена на 21.07.10

http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/ … no=B220404

Отредактировано EllaS (02-07-2010 16:00:11)

Judge Dismisses Most Claims in Suit Against Jackson Estate Over Final Tour
Victor Li
New York Law JournalJuly 09, 2010

A federal judge in Manhattan said Beat It to most counts in a $300 million suit filed against Michael Jackson's estate, Jackson's supposed ex-manager, and Anshutz Entertainment Group over promotional rights to the comeback tour the King of Pop was planning prior to his death last summer.

The plaintiff, AllGood Entertainment, Inc., alleged in a May 2009 complaint (filed a month before Jackson died) that Jackson, though his purported manager, Frank Dileo, had signed a deal to perform either a solo concert tour or a Jackson Family reunion concert to be promoted by AllGood. But months after striking its deal with Dileo, AllGood alleged, AllGood found out that Jackson had, in fact, agreed to work with AEG on the "This Is It" series of shows scheduled to begin in London in the fall of 2009. Represented by Meyerowitz Jekielek, AllGood claimed breach of contract, fraud, and tortious interference against Jackson, Dileo and AEG.

But Southern District of New York Judge Harold Baer found in AllGood Entertainment, Inc. v. Dileo Entertainment and Touring, Inc., 09 Civ. 5377, there were "no specific factual allegations" to support AllGood's claim for tortious interference, and AllGood's factual basis for fraud was "at best thin." In an 18-page ruling, the judge denied AllGood's request for an injunction and granted defense motions to dismiss the fraud and tortious interference claims. He denied a motion to dismiss the breach of contract claim, finding there was sufficient uncertainty for it to proceed. But the judge seemed skeptical about whether AllGood even had an enforceable contract with Dileo, agreeing with defendants that the document in question was more of a letter of intent rather than a binding offer and acceptance.

AEG's lead counsel, Kathleen Ann Jorrie of Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, told us she was not surprised by the ruling. "I believe the judge is correct in his assessment, and that he did a very thorough analysis in his review of both our motion and Dileo's. It was nice to receive it when we did, because we were in the process of preparing a summary judgment motion," Jorrie said. AEG, she noted, is now out of the case because it is not a party to the surviving breach of contract claim.

Howard Weitzman of Kinsella, Weitzman, Iser, Kump & Aldisert, who is counsel to Jackson's estate, said he intends to file a summary judgment motion on the contract claim within the week. "From the estate's perspective … Michael Jackson never agreed to anything, never breached any agreement, and … should not be held liable for any damages that were incurred, if they were incurred," he said. "Based on what I know today, I don't think any truthful fact will surface that will change my opinion that the estate does not owe AllGood anything." (Frank Dileo, according to the docket, was represented by Greenberg Traurig. He could not be reached for comment.)

Plaintiffs lawyers Ira Scot Meyerowitz and Jon Damon Jekielek of Meyerowitz Jekielek said that they were still expecting a Thriller of a trial in the fall. "We were disappointed that the claims against AEG were dismissed, but we're encouraged that the claims our client has against Dileo and the estate of Michael Jackson are still in play," Jekielek said. "We've gone forward with depositions and discovery over the last couple of months, and we're more confident in our claims against the remaining parties."

Meyerowitz said he was not ready to give up on claims against AEG. "I may consider a motion for reconsideration," he said. "We believe there is knowledge on AEG's side, however we don't have the smoking gun we need. What do you do when you have a person who is dead like Michael Jackson, who can't say he knew about the AllGood agreement and told AEG about it?"

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1 … 98532&

По апелляционной жалобе Джо Джексона выступление в суде назначено на 6 октября 2010 года:
Oral Argument Date/Time:    10/06/2010   01:30 PM

http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/ … no=B220404

а очередное заседание суда до доктору - на 4 января, если не ошибаюсь?

26/10 Апелляционный суд отклонил апелляцию Джо Джексона на решение суда низшей инстанции.

http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/ … no=B220404

10/26/2010 Opinion filed.   (Signed Unpublished)
The probate court's judgment dismissing Joseph's objection to the appointment of the executors is affirmed. Respondents are awarded their costs on appeal. 21 pages; ZWJ

Отредактировано Ines (27-10-2010 00:02:36)